Skip to main content

Mobile phones and its effect on employees.

Mobile phones have become widespread in Papua New Guinea since the major expansion of services around 2007, with high mobile penetration especially in urban areas like Port Moresby. 

While they bring clear benefits like better communication, business coordination, and access to information, there are notable negative effects on staff performance in workplaces, though specific PNG-focused studies on employees (as opposed to students or general users) are limited.

Key Negative Effects Observed in PNG Contexts:
Excessive or inappropriate mobile phone use can lead to distractions, reduced focus, and lower productivity. 
In PNG, discussions often highlight similar issues to global trends, but with local nuances like social media addiction, high personal usage during work hours, and cultural factors around constant connectivity (e.g., family obligations or "phone friend" stories leading to personal distractions spilling into work).

Distraction and Reduced Focus — Notifications from social media, calls, texts, or apps pull attention away from tasks. This mirrors global findings where smartphone distractions fragment attention and lower output, but in PNG workplaces (offices, public sector, retail, etc.), it contributes to time-wasting during work hours.

Lower Productivity — Time spent on non-work activities (e.g., scrolling, chatting, or personal calls) directly cuts into work time. In broader Pacific/ developing contexts, this has been linked to decreased efficiency, though PNG reports more often tie it to education (e.g., students' academic performance dropping due to excessive use and social media distractions).

Health and Well-Being Impacts — Addiction-like behaviors can lead to fatigue, stress, or poor work-life balance, indirectly affecting performance. 
PNG sources note concerns over addiction, misinformation, and negative content exposure.

Other Spillover Issues — In some cases, phones enable coordination of non-work matters (e.g., personal relationships or side activities), which can distract or even contribute to absenteeism/morale issues.

Much of the documented concern in PNG centers on students rather than formal workplace staff — for example, excessive smartphone use correlates with poorer academic performance due to distractions from social media and non-study activities. 
Similar patterns likely apply to younger employees or entry-level staff in offices, shops, or government roles, where personal phone use during shifts reduces output.

Workplace-specific data for PNG is scarcer than for education, but global patterns (e.g., phones as a top distraction killing productivity via notifications and social media) align with local observations. 
PNG's rapid mobile growth has amplified these issues without widespread workplace policies to restrict use.

Broader PNG Context:
Mobile phones have boosted economic activity overall (e.g., for SMEs via calls/SMS for business), 
but negatives include: high costs, battery challenges in rural areas, and social concerns like scams or relationship issues from connectivity. 

In professional settings, unmanaged use can undermine performance, especially in roles requiring concentration (e.g., administration, customer service).

To mitigate negatives, many organizations globally (and likely some in PNG) implement policies like limiting personal phone use during work hours, designated break times for checking devices, or no-phone zones. 
A balanced approach — using phones productively (e.g., for work communication) while curbing distractions — helps maximize benefits.

In summary, mobile phones are powerful tools that can enhance employee performance and flexibility—but without boundaries, they frequently undermine focus and output. The key is intentional, moderated use rather than unrestricted access.

Myrosesdiary

Comments